<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlackBerry WebKit Browser Demoed by Mike Lazaridis At MWC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2010/02/16/blackberry-webkit-browser-demoed-by-mike-lazaridis-at-mwc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2010/02/16/blackberry-webkit-browser-demoed-by-mike-lazaridis-at-mwc/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:45:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2010/02/16/blackberry-webkit-browser-demoed-by-mike-lazaridis-at-mwc/#comment-46327</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 02:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=32783#comment-46327</guid>
		<description>I too am mostly satisfied with the browser. Especially on sites like this that are optimized for BlackBerry. While I DO think it needs improving, BlackBerry does SO MANY things better than other platforms it would take FAR more than lack of a &quot;the full web&quot; browser for me to switch platforms. That in my mind would be throwing the baby out with the bath water and any one (in my opinion) that would jump ship from BlackBerry to iPhone or Android or S60 or WinMo or whatever isn&#039;t looking at the WHOLE of the smartphone experience. 

From my BlackBerry Tour...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am mostly satisfied with the browser. Especially on sites like this that are optimized for BlackBerry. While I DO think it needs improving, BlackBerry does SO MANY things better than other platforms it would take FAR more than lack of a &#8220;the full web&#8221; browser for me to switch platforms. That in my mind would be throwing the baby out with the bath water and any one (in my opinion) that would jump ship from BlackBerry to iPhone or Android or S60 or WinMo or whatever isn&#8217;t looking at the WHOLE of the smartphone experience. </p>
<p>From my BlackBerry Tour&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadillac Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2010/02/16/blackberry-webkit-browser-demoed-by-mike-lazaridis-at-mwc/#comment-46324</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadillac Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=32783#comment-46324</guid>
		<description>Sorry, you are right - I just had a second look at my source of that claim (http://crackberry.com/research-motion-acquires-torch-mobile) and clearly I mis-read the date... By a long-shot.


I still stand by what I said though - RIM is apparently one of the largest smartphone manufacturers in the world and is rolling in profit at the moment... If they want to stay ahead of the game, they need to work quicker on things like improved browsers.

Just so you know, I&#039;m one of the few people that is actually (mostly) happy with the current browser, but if people are so concerned about its performance and/or are considering other smartphone operating systems, possibly because of their gripes with the current browser, well RIM need to sort their s%$t out before they fall from grace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, you are right &#8211; I just had a second look at my source of that claim (<a href="http://crackberry.com/research-motion-acquires-torch-mobile" rel="nofollow">http://crackberry.com/research-motion-acquires-torch-mobile</a>) and clearly I mis-read the date&#8230; By a long-shot.</p>
<p>I still stand by what I said though &#8211; RIM is apparently one of the largest smartphone manufacturers in the world and is rolling in profit at the moment&#8230; If they want to stay ahead of the game, they need to work quicker on things like improved browsers.</p>
<p>Just so you know, I&#8217;m one of the few people that is actually (mostly) happy with the current browser, but if people are so concerned about its performance and/or are considering other smartphone operating systems, possibly because of their gripes with the current browser, well RIM need to sort their s%$t out before they fall from grace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2010/02/16/blackberry-webkit-browser-demoed-by-mike-lazaridis-at-mwc/#comment-46138</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=32783#comment-46138</guid>
		<description>Dude...try your search button. The Torch acquisition was barely 6 months ago. And such a dramatic change takes a lot to develop and plan for rolling out. For OS 5 only or older OS&#039;s too? Standalone (like Messenger is now) or wait for carrier OS rollouts? Major apps rely on the browser engine, will they break? Etc. 

It isn&#039;t just as simple as buy Torch and push out a new browser. As embeded as the browser IS in the OS, this is HARD. Microsoft is HUGE compared to RIM and even two major releases later and the resources they can put into browser development and they STILL can&#039;t get people off IE6 browser due to all the things that will break. 

Patience grasshopper...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude&#8230;try your search button. The Torch acquisition was barely 6 months ago. And such a dramatic change takes a lot to develop and plan for rolling out. For OS 5 only or older OS&#8217;s too? Standalone (like Messenger is now) or wait for carrier OS rollouts? Major apps rely on the browser engine, will they break? Etc. </p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t just as simple as buy Torch and push out a new browser. As embeded as the browser IS in the OS, this is HARD. Microsoft is HUGE compared to RIM and even two major releases later and the resources they can put into browser development and they STILL can&#8217;t get people off IE6 browser due to all the things that will break. </p>
<p>Patience grasshopper&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadillac Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2010/02/16/blackberry-webkit-browser-demoed-by-mike-lazaridis-at-mwc/#comment-46133</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadillac Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=32783#comment-46133</guid>
		<description>Over a year since Research in Motion (RIM) purchased Torch and this is all they&#039;ve got?

Yes, it looks nice and it&#039;s probably better than the current browser, but if it&#039;s taken RIM over a year to PREVIEW their new browser, how long is it going to take before they RELEASE it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over a year since Research in Motion (RIM) purchased Torch and this is all they&#8217;ve got?</p>
<p>Yes, it looks nice and it&#8217;s probably better than the current browser, but if it&#8217;s taken RIM over a year to PREVIEW their new browser, how long is it going to take before they RELEASE it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CadillacCowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2010/02/16/blackberry-webkit-browser-demoed-by-mike-lazaridis-at-mwc/#comment-46122</link>
		<dc:creator>CadillacCowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=32783#comment-46122</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s taken Research in Motion (RIM) this long to update their browser, it&#039;d wanna be good... If not, it&#039;ll likely be outdated by the time it&#039;s released!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s taken Research in Motion (RIM) this long to update their browser, it&#8217;d wanna be good&#8230; If not, it&#8217;ll likely be outdated by the time it&#8217;s released!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PDM</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2010/02/16/blackberry-webkit-browser-demoed-by-mike-lazaridis-at-mwc/#comment-46078</link>
		<dc:creator>PDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=32783#comment-46078</guid>
		<description>&quot;Demo&#039;d&quot;?  You mean they showed a canned video...  Which is very unimpressive.
It actually says a lot when they are unable to do a &quot;live&quot; demo... i.e. 6-9mths before we see anything meanlingful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Demo&#8217;d&#8221;?  You mean they showed a canned video&#8230;  Which is very unimpressive.<br />
It actually says a lot when they are unable to do a &#8220;live&#8221; demo&#8230; i.e. 6-9mths before we see anything meanlingful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 319/323 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn3.berryreview.com

Served from: www.berryreview.com @ 2012-02-12 05:37:23 -->
