<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor: BlackBerry Pearl 9100 Rumored to Bring 802.11n Wi-Fi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2009/12/16/rumor-blackberry-pearl-9100-rumored-to-bring-802-11n-wi-fi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/12/16/rumor-blackberry-pearl-9100-rumored-to-bring-802-11n-wi-fi/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:36:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrence</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/12/16/rumor-blackberry-pearl-9100-rumored-to-bring-802-11n-wi-fi/#comment-41048</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/12/16/rumor-blackberry-pearl-9100-rumored-to-bring-802-11n-wi-fi/#comment-41048</guid>
		<description>N would give it a much bigger range.. But i doubt it will benifit in terms of speed since its pretty much limited due to the processor..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N would give it a much bigger range.. But i doubt it will benifit in terms of speed since its pretty much limited due to the processor..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/12/16/rumor-blackberry-pearl-9100-rumored-to-bring-802-11n-wi-fi/#comment-41030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/12/16/rumor-blackberry-pearl-9100-rumored-to-bring-802-11n-wi-fi/#comment-41030</guid>
		<description>Increased range for UMA would be a wonderful benefit to having 802.11n available on the Blackberry or other UMA phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Increased range for UMA would be a wonderful benefit to having 802.11n available on the Blackberry or other UMA phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/12/16/rumor-blackberry-pearl-9100-rumored-to-bring-802-11n-wi-fi/#comment-40339</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/12/16/rumor-blackberry-pearl-9100-rumored-to-bring-802-11n-wi-fi/#comment-40339</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the point? Wireless G is 53 meg which is way faster than most internet connections so as has been said before this is overkill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the point? Wireless G is 53 meg which is way faster than most internet connections so as has been said before this is overkill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Crannell</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/12/16/rumor-blackberry-pearl-9100-rumored-to-bring-802-11n-wi-fi/#comment-40200</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Crannell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/12/16/rumor-blackberry-pearl-9100-rumored-to-bring-802-11n-wi-fi/#comment-40200</guid>
		<description>I think that WiFi on BlackBerry is completely irrelevant until someone produces a browser that is remotely usable. I have daily iPhone/Droid/Google World Domination Phone (I heard this was the code name....) lust whenever I fire up any of the three BB browsers I try to use on my otherwise flawless BB Bold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that WiFi on BlackBerry is completely irrelevant until someone produces a browser that is remotely usable. I have daily iPhone/Droid/Google World Domination Phone (I heard this was the code name&#8230;.) lust whenever I fire up any of the three BB browsers I try to use on my otherwise flawless BB Bold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/12/16/rumor-blackberry-pearl-9100-rumored-to-bring-802-11n-wi-fi/#comment-40199</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/12/16/rumor-blackberry-pearl-9100-rumored-to-bring-802-11n-wi-fi/#comment-40199</guid>
		<description>what do I think? I think &quot;n&quot; is massive overkill for that half keyboard and teeny tiny screen on a Pearl! ;)

But, yeah, I can see the benefit of being able to turn off a and b and g on my routers and waps. 

From my BlackBerry Storm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what do I think? I think &#8220;n&#8221; is massive overkill for that half keyboard and teeny tiny screen on a Pearl! <img src='http://cdn3.berryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But, yeah, I can see the benefit of being able to turn off a and b and g on my routers and waps. </p>
<p>From my BlackBerry Storm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 312/316 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn3.berryreview.com

Served from: www.berryreview.com @ 2012-02-12 11:38:07 -->
