<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon Commercial Really Digs Into AT&amp;T 3G Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2009/10/08/verizon-commercial-really-digs-into-att-3g-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/10/08/verizon-commercial-really-digs-into-att-3g-coverage/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: sweetstuff45</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/10/08/verizon-commercial-really-digs-into-att-3g-coverage/#comment-32623</link>
		<dc:creator>sweetstuff45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/10/08/verizon-commercial-really-digs-into-att-3g-coverage/#comment-32623</guid>
		<description>You know wut it may b tru that currently verizons network is larger but my iphone still works great on my at&amp;t network and it really is the most incredible phone I&#039;ve ever had.Let me tell u another thing, I got a paycut at work and called at&amp;t to see if there was anyway they could work with me on getting some kind of payment arrangement, and they did! They worked with me and the customer service was amazing! I had verizon for 5 years before my iphone and never received that kind of courtesy. I kno at&amp;t is the underdog as far as network coverage but I kno their gonna improve their technology soon and when they do verizon and tmobile are done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know wut it may b tru that currently verizons network is larger but my iphone still works great on my at&amp;t network and it really is the most incredible phone I&#8217;ve ever had.Let me tell u another thing, I got a paycut at work and called at&amp;t to see if there was anyway they could work with me on getting some kind of payment arrangement, and they did! They worked with me and the customer service was amazing! I had verizon for 5 years before my iphone and never received that kind of courtesy. I kno at&amp;t is the underdog as far as network coverage but I kno their gonna improve their technology soon and when they do verizon and tmobile are done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotzb22</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/10/08/verizon-commercial-really-digs-into-att-3g-coverage/#comment-31910</link>
		<dc:creator>hotzb22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/10/08/verizon-commercial-really-digs-into-att-3g-coverage/#comment-31910</guid>
		<description>yea u right i work in CC for att and we got a email about that lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea u right i work in CC for att and we got a email about that lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The One</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/10/08/verizon-commercial-really-digs-into-att-3g-coverage/#comment-31908</link>
		<dc:creator>The One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/10/08/verizon-commercial-really-digs-into-att-3g-coverage/#comment-31908</guid>
		<description>Yeah you are wrong.  I can 100% confirm that the ATT 3G map from the commercial is spot on.  ATT wisely decided not to allow the ability to show only 3G coverage on the map to customers, as it looks pretty bad.  However, ATT employees can see it internally.  There is no debate, or argument there.  VZW&#039;s 3G coverage, far surpasses AT&amp;T&#039;s.  It&#039;s not even close.  However, AT&amp;T has the advantage of being a little faster, and have voice and data at the same time.  It depends on what is most important to each individual.  If AT&amp;T&#039;s data was leaps and bounds faster than VZW, I&#039;d choose them, however, that is certainly not the case.  The simultaneous voice and data is sweet though.  For me, coverage/quality is always my top priority with a provider.

Oh yeah,  if the map from the commercial was inaccurate, I guarantee that you hear/see something official from AT&amp;T in that regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah you are wrong.  I can 100% confirm that the ATT 3G map from the commercial is spot on.  ATT wisely decided not to allow the ability to show only 3G coverage on the map to customers, as it looks pretty bad.  However, ATT employees can see it internally.  There is no debate, or argument there.  VZW&#8217;s 3G coverage, far surpasses AT&amp;T&#8217;s.  It&#8217;s not even close.  However, AT&amp;T has the advantage of being a little faster, and have voice and data at the same time.  It depends on what is most important to each individual.  If AT&amp;T&#8217;s data was leaps and bounds faster than VZW, I&#8217;d choose them, however, that is certainly not the case.  The simultaneous voice and data is sweet though.  For me, coverage/quality is always my top priority with a provider.</p>
<p>Oh yeah,  if the map from the commercial was inaccurate, I guarantee that you hear/see something official from AT&amp;T in that regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 286/290 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn3.berryreview.com

Served from: www.berryreview.com @ 2012-02-12 04:41:43 -->
