<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIM Reveals Browser Certificate Vulnerability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:08:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Fallo de seguridad en el Browser de BlackBerry &#124; miBlackBerry.com - Noticias, Software, Temas, Juegos y Accesorios para BlackBerry</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31652</link>
		<dc:creator>Fallo de seguridad en el Browser de BlackBerry &#124; miBlackBerry.com - Noticias, Software, Temas, Juegos y Accesorios para BlackBerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31652</guid>
		<description>[...] Fuente: Al Sacco y Ronen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fuente: Al Sacco y Ronen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIM reveals security issue with BlackBerry browser &#124; BB Geeks</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31599</link>
		<dc:creator>RIM reveals security issue with BlackBerry browser &#124; BB Geeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31599</guid>
		<description>[...] is not yet available for some carriers, so be sure to check back frequently. I&#8217;ll agree with Ronen of BerryReview that the carrier approval system of OS patches might not be the best mode of distribution. This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is not yet available for some carriers, so be sure to check back frequently. I&#8217;ll agree with Ronen of BerryReview that the carrier approval system of OS patches might not be the best mode of distribution. This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaediil</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31526</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaediil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31526</guid>
		<description>I love that the 4.7.1.57 is required but not even yet leaked for the Tour.  It is only currently being pushed to limited numbers of Sprint BES users as far as I have heard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that the 4.7.1.57 is required but not even yet leaked for the Tour.  It is only currently being pushed to limited numbers of Sprint BES users as far as I have heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31523</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31523</guid>
		<description>Yeah!!! More OS upgrades...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah!!! More OS upgrades&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31515</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31515</guid>
		<description>Pretty obvious that:
A) RIM doesn&#039;t care about devices not running at least 4.5. I think we are going to see that ALL solutions to anything arising on those devices is &quot;Upgrade to new phone please&quot;. 
B) RIM isn&#039;t going to say anything about 5.0, it isn&#039;t released so technically NOBODY should be running but beta testers. Right. 
C) Another speed bump for Storm, I&#039;m SURE this will through the entire Verizon TA process back to square one to fix the flaws in .148. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty obvious that:<br />
A) RIM doesn&#8217;t care about devices not running at least 4.5. I think we are going to see that ALL solutions to anything arising on those devices is &#8220;Upgrade to new phone please&#8221;.<br />
B) RIM isn&#8217;t going to say anything about 5.0, it isn&#8217;t released so technically NOBODY should be running but beta testers. Right.<br />
C) Another speed bump for Storm, I&#8217;m SURE this will through the entire Verizon TA process back to square one to fix the flaws in .148. <img src='http://cdn3.berryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joolie</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31509</link>
		<dc:creator>Joolie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31509</guid>
		<description>IMO, I would *guess* 5.0 will have it, but its hasn\&#039;t been released yet so can\&#039;t be sure (and who knows if the beta version floating about has it since it\&#039;s not official yet).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO, I would *guess* 5.0 will have it, but its hasn\&#8217;t been released yet so can\&#8217;t be sure (and who knows if the beta version floating about has it since it\&#8217;s not official yet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: automan69</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31507</link>
		<dc:creator>automan69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31507</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info joolie. Do you know if the new os 5.0 will have the protection? Or Are we still vulnerable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info joolie. Do you know if the new os 5.0 will have the protection? Or Are we still vulnerable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joolie</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31506</link>
		<dc:creator>Joolie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31506</guid>
		<description>Ignore it and it will go away....we&#039;ll get those users to upgrade their devices somehow!  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignore it and it will go away&#8230;.we&#8217;ll get those users to upgrade their devices somehow!  <img src='http://cdn3.berryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronen Halevy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31505</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Halevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31505</guid>
		<description>Good point. I am not sure what the story is for older devices. Could be RIM did not want to bring attention to the fact that they have EOL&#039;ed them for OS updates</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I am not sure what the story is for older devices. Could be RIM did not want to bring attention to the fact that they have EOL&#8217;ed them for OS updates</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joolie</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31504</link>
		<dc:creator>Joolie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31504</guid>
		<description>The patch list is for the OS version - regardless of if they are GSM vs CDMA.  My 8330 Curve has OS 4.5.0.169, which is the latest available for that device.  However, the table above states I should have 4.5.0.173....which I havent even seen in beta anywhere.

I do not, however, see any OS&#039;s for earlier versions.  I have users still on 4.2 or 4.3 so I will need to get them upgraded.  I even have some 7290&#039;s on 4.0 (UGH!), but there is no 4.5 OS for that old device.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The patch list is for the OS version &#8211; regardless of if they are GSM vs CDMA.  My 8330 Curve has OS 4.5.0.169, which is the latest available for that device.  However, the table above states I should have 4.5.0.173&#8230;.which I havent even seen in beta anywhere.</p>
<p>I do not, however, see any OS&#8217;s for earlier versions.  I have users still on 4.2 or 4.3 so I will need to get them upgraded.  I even have some 7290&#8242;s on 4.0 (UGH!), but there is no 4.5 OS for that old device&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: automan69</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31497</link>
		<dc:creator>automan69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/29/rim-reveals-browser-certificate-vulnerability/#comment-31497</guid>
		<description>I could be wrong here, but the patch list looks like for GSM phones. Do you have the list for CDMA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could be wrong here, but the patch list looks like for GSM phones. Do you have the list for CDMA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 382/386 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn3.berryreview.com

Served from: www.berryreview.com @ 2012-02-11 22:53:11 -->
