<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T pulls latest Bold firmware upgrade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/05/att-pulls-latest-bold-firmware-upgrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/05/att-pulls-latest-bold-firmware-upgrade/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:55:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Merlos</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/05/att-pulls-latest-bold-firmware-upgrade/#comment-30132</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Merlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=25837#comment-30132</guid>
		<description>I find it that OS usually works a lot better when I use a beta than when I use one thats officially released by a carrier, for example 4.6.1.250 work great when it leaked, upgraded  to the official release from Rogers I believe, OS worked like crap, so decided to bump it up to 5.0 my phone works great besides the fact that some apps don&#039;t work, but  performance wise is awesome. Carriers wait a century to release it anyways by that time the best stuff out is the leak versions, so what&#039;s the point. I haven&#039;t really used carrier issue OS more than a few times so what&#039;s the point on waiting for their approval anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it that OS usually works a lot better when I use a beta than when I use one thats officially released by a carrier, for example 4.6.1.250 work great when it leaked, upgraded  to the official release from Rogers I believe, OS worked like crap, so decided to bump it up to 5.0 my phone works great besides the fact that some apps don&#8217;t work, but  performance wise is awesome. Carriers wait a century to release it anyways by that time the best stuff out is the leak versions, so what&#8217;s the point. I haven&#8217;t really used carrier issue OS more than a few times so what&#8217;s the point on waiting for their approval anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/09/05/att-pulls-latest-bold-firmware-upgrade/#comment-30121</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 11:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=25837#comment-30121</guid>
		<description>Right. Ronen advocates carrier&#039;s not being involved or being less involved in the firmware release process. So here we have ATT releasing a firmware and it breaks stuff. Yeah, so what&#039;s the point RIM? You waited for a carrier to release this and it still broke stuff. So RIM needs to a) do a better job of internal QA/QC and b) don&#039;t wait for a carrier ok since that obviously doesn&#039;t matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. Ronen advocates carrier&#8217;s not being involved or being less involved in the firmware release process. So here we have ATT releasing a firmware and it breaks stuff. Yeah, so what&#8217;s the point RIM? You waited for a carrier to release this and it still broke stuff. So RIM needs to a) do a better job of internal QA/QC and b) don&#8217;t wait for a carrier ok since that obviously doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 275/279 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn3.berryreview.com

Served from: www.berryreview.com @ 2012-02-11 06:38:13 -->
