<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T &amp; Verizon Arguing if Most Reliable 3G Means Fastest 3G</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28383</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28383</guid>
		<description>I currently have Vzw and had ATT for a while here in the NYC area. I think VZW is better but ATT okay for voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently have Vzw and had ATT for a while here in the NYC area. I think VZW is better but ATT okay for voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28380</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28380</guid>
		<description>As a holder of T, I&#039;m not sure how to take that. . . ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a holder of T, I&#8217;m not sure how to take that. . . <img src='http://cdn3.berryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronen Halevy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28373</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Halevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28373</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t you know that AT&amp;T owns more dive bars compared to any other carrier? Its where us bloggers go do drown our sarcasm. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t you know that AT&#038;T owns more dive bars compared to any other carrier? Its where us bloggers go do drown our sarcasm. <img src='http://cdn3.berryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28372</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28372</guid>
		<description>Yeah, and their &quot;more bars in more places&quot; is true only when you take into account they use GSM phones that of COURSE get &quot;bars&quot; in many places worldwide where there is no CDMA. Another &quot;technically true&quot; statement that&#039;s in all practicality meaningless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and their &#8220;more bars in more places&#8221; is true only when you take into account they use GSM phones that of COURSE get &#8220;bars&#8221; in many places worldwide where there is no CDMA. Another &#8220;technically true&#8221; statement that&#8217;s in all practicality meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolaus Walch</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28353</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaus Walch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28353</guid>
		<description>AT&amp;T &quot;fewest dropped calls&quot; was a bunch of lies (proven) and their 3G claims have also alway been a bunch of lies.  I&#039;d like to see them get hammered down hard in the public eye over this one.  I don&#039;t like Verizorn either, but AT&amp;T is the worse of the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T &#8220;fewest dropped calls&#8221; was a bunch of lies (proven) and their 3G claims have also alway been a bunch of lies.  I&#8217;d like to see them get hammered down hard in the public eye over this one.  I don&#8217;t like Verizorn either, but AT&amp;T is the worse of the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28344</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28344</guid>
		<description>Well for ME, &quot;reliable&quot; has always been more important than &quot;fastest&quot;. Likely why I&#039;ve been with Verizon going on 15 years now (yes, I had a bag phone). 

That&#039;s hilarious though that a CDMA Curve would beat a GSM Bold in your experience. I knew things were bad in NYC, but not THAT bad! Blame it on the tourists with their iPhones...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well for ME, &#8220;reliable&#8221; has always been more important than &#8220;fastest&#8221;. Likely why I&#8217;ve been with Verizon going on 15 years now (yes, I had a bag phone). </p>
<p>That&#8217;s hilarious though that a CDMA Curve would beat a GSM Bold in your experience. I knew things were bad in NYC, but not THAT bad! Blame it on the tourists with their iPhones&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The One</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28341</link>
		<dc:creator>The One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/07/29/att-verizon-arguing-if-most-reliable-3g-means-fastest-3g/#comment-28341</guid>
		<description>hmmm, this is interesting, because to me, &quot;reliability&quot;, and &quot;fastest&quot;, is obviously two different things.  This is a pretty ridiculous argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm, this is interesting, because to me, &#8220;reliability&#8221;, and &#8220;fastest&#8221;, is obviously two different things.  This is a pretty ridiculous argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 338/342 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn3.berryreview.com

Served from: www.berryreview.com @ 2012-02-12 13:20:02 -->
