<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Balsillie Explains Why BlackBerry is the Most Profitable for Carriers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2009/04/06/balsillie-explains-why-blackberry-is-the-most-profitable-for-carriers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/04/06/balsillie-explains-why-blackberry-is-the-most-profitable-for-carriers/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: WilliamT</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/04/06/balsillie-explains-why-blackberry-is-the-most-profitable-for-carriers/#comment-22816</link>
		<dc:creator>WilliamT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/04/06/balsillie-explains-why-blackberry-is-the-most-profitable-for-carriers/#comment-22816</guid>
		<description>In the carrier space it takes about $0.02 (or even €0.02) for each megabit/s of data being pushed around the network.    If there are ways to squish that data out of the equation, it becomes much better in two major ways: 1) The end user quality of experience (QoE) is better because everything is going faster  and 2) The Carrier works more efficiently because the network infrastructure is not being wasted.

There are companies like &quot;Flash Networks&quot; and others that specialise in doing for iPhones what RIM is doing for BlackBerry&#039;s - removing the overhead.  It really makes a difference.  You don&#039;t even have to put a &quot;client&quot; application on the handset or other network device to make it work. 

I&#039;ve been a LONG time user of the BlackBerry world I&#039;m happy to say.  I like the iPhone for sex appeal but , like in any relationship, it&#039;s better to marry for brains and earning potential as looks fade :)

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the carrier space it takes about $0.02 (or even €0.02) for each megabit/s of data being pushed around the network.    If there are ways to squish that data out of the equation, it becomes much better in two major ways: 1) The end user quality of experience (QoE) is better because everything is going faster  and 2) The Carrier works more efficiently because the network infrastructure is not being wasted.</p>
<p>There are companies like &#8220;Flash Networks&#8221; and others that specialise in doing for iPhones what RIM is doing for BlackBerry&#8217;s &#8211; removing the overhead.  It really makes a difference.  You don&#8217;t even have to put a &#8220;client&#8221; application on the handset or other network device to make it work. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a LONG time user of the BlackBerry world I&#8217;m happy to say.  I like the iPhone for sex appeal but , like in any relationship, it&#8217;s better to marry for brains and earning potential as looks fade <img src='http://cdn3.berryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/04/06/balsillie-explains-why-blackberry-is-the-most-profitable-for-carriers/#comment-22806</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/04/06/balsillie-explains-why-blackberry-is-the-most-profitable-for-carriers/#comment-22806</guid>
		<description>T needs more backhaul capacity BADLY so good on that! Helps Bold users too!!!

So Jim is right and all,  but this is spin. BlackBerry being more profitable for carriers may be true and all but that doesn&#039;t endear the devices to potential customers. RIM had better have a far better marketing campaign this summer than they did last year, as the next iPhone recession or recovery or not is gonna be HUGE. RIM, above truths won&#039;t help you against Apple....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T needs more backhaul capacity BADLY so good on that! Helps Bold users too!!!</p>
<p>So Jim is right and all,  but this is spin. BlackBerry being more profitable for carriers may be true and all but that doesn&#8217;t endear the devices to potential customers. RIM had better have a far better marketing campaign this summer than they did last year, as the next iPhone recession or recovery or not is gonna be HUGE. RIM, above truths won&#8217;t help you against Apple&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 279/283 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn3.berryreview.com

Served from: www.berryreview.com @ 2012-02-12 13:46:11 -->
