<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAQ: Comparing BES 5.0 With Previous Versions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday Morning WES stuff &#124; BB Geeks</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-24237</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Morning WES stuff &#124; BB Geeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 12:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-24237</guid>
		<description>[...] nice to have it finally drop. For more info on the features contained in the new BES, check out BerryReview&#8217;s comparison with previous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nice to have it finally drop. For more info on the features contained in the new BES, check out BerryReview&#8217;s comparison with previous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanzim</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22430</link>
		<dc:creator>tanzim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 04:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22430</guid>
		<description>This is very cool comparison. Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very cool comparison. Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAQ: Comparing BES 5.0 for Lotus Domino with Previous Versions &#124; BerryReview.com &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22367</link>
		<dc:creator>FAQ: Comparing BES 5.0 for Lotus Domino with Previous Versions &#124; BerryReview.com &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22367</guid>
		<description>[...] this week we posted a document detailing the differences between all the different BES versions up to version 5.0 in a chart. The problem was that the chart [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this week we posted a document detailing the differences between all the different BES versions up to version 5.0 in a chart. The problem was that the chart [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim MacNeil</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22361</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim MacNeil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22361</guid>
		<description>If there is any difference between the Domino version and this one, I&#039;d love to get those. Accuracy leads to fewer embarrassments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is any difference between the Domino version and this one, I&#8217;d love to get those. Accuracy leads to fewer embarrassments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Enterprise Server 5.0 Feature Comparison</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22311</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Enterprise Server 5.0 Feature Comparison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22311</guid>
		<description>[...] [via BerryReview] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via BerryReview] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronen Halevy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22279</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Halevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22279</guid>
		<description>@csc
I have the ibm lotus notes chart if you want me to post it. I just thought it was more or less the same... Let me know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@csc<br />
I have the ibm lotus notes chart if you want me to post it. I just thought it was more or less the same&#8230; Let me know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csc</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22278</link>
		<dc:creator>csc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22278</guid>
		<description>Is there a comparable chart for IBM Lotus Notes/Domino since sometimes BES features are available in one platform but not the other?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a comparable chart for IBM Lotus Notes/Domino since sometimes BES features are available in one platform but not the other?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magikweis</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22229</link>
		<dc:creator>magikweis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22229</guid>
		<description>Cool stuff !

But what about all those notes that is refered to ? You know, those little numbers 1, 2, 3 and so on ?

Where´s the explanation ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool stuff !</p>
<p>But what about all those notes that is refered to ? You know, those little numbers 1, 2, 3 and so on ?</p>
<p>Where´s the explanation ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22217</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22217</guid>
		<description>Sure wish forwarding calendar entries would come to a BIS near me...but that&#039;s the only end user improvement I see that would be useful for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure wish forwarding calendar entries would come to a BIS near me&#8230;but that&#8217;s the only end user improvement I see that would be useful for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n8d</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22170</link>
		<dc:creator>n8d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22170</guid>
		<description>@ Ronen
No need for that. Doesn&#039;t matter to me one way or another where it came from to be honest with ya. =-)
I was just going to say that someone had waaaayyyyyyyy too much time on their hands to create that if it wasn&#039;t RIM and was going to thank them to end. 
Like you said, this great to have all of this in one place where you can lay it out in front of someone and say &quot;look, here&#039;s what you have, and here&#039;s what you&#039;re missing (going to be missing). 

Again, great find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ronen<br />
No need for that. Doesn&#8217;t matter to me one way or another where it came from to be honest with ya. =-)<br />
I was just going to say that someone had waaaayyyyyyyy too much time on their hands to create that if it wasn&#8217;t RIM and was going to thank them to end.<br />
Like you said, this great to have all of this in one place where you can lay it out in front of someone and say &#8220;look, here&#8217;s what you have, and here&#8217;s what you&#8217;re missing (going to be missing). </p>
<p>Again, great find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronen Halevy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22168</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Halevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22168</guid>
		<description>@All
I can confirm that this definitely is a RIM created guide but I have no idea why they have not made it available to all their beta testers. If you want I can upload the cover page and credits RIM has at the end but I just did not find them that relevant... On the other hand the rest of the document is extremely useful which is why I thought it would be great to share! :)
This kind of chart makes pitching an upgrade to BES 5.0 much more compelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@All<br />
I can confirm that this definitely is a RIM created guide but I have no idea why they have not made it available to all their beta testers. If you want I can upload the cover page and credits RIM has at the end but I just did not find them that relevant&#8230; On the other hand the rest of the document is extremely useful which is why I thought it would be great to share! <img src='http://cdn3.berryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
This kind of chart makes pitching an upgrade to BES 5.0 much more compelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n8d</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22167</link>
		<dc:creator>n8d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22167</guid>
		<description>Not sure if this is an actual RIM document or something someone put together, but this is great regardless. 
+1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if this is an actual RIM document or something someone put together, but this is great regardless.<br />
+1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comparando la futura versión de BES 5.0 con sus predecesoras &#124; miBlackBerry.com - Noticias, Software, Temas, Juegos y Accesorios para BlackBerry</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22166</link>
		<dc:creator>Comparando la futura versión de BES 5.0 con sus predecesoras &#124; miBlackBerry.com - Noticias, Software, Temas, Juegos y Accesorios para BlackBerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22166</guid>
		<description>[...] Fuente: BerryReview [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fuente: BerryReview [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Gilmore</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22165</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Gilmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22165</guid>
		<description>Ironically this doesn&#039;t seem to be in any of the information available to the BES 5 beta testers (unless I&#039;m missing it somewhere).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically this doesn&#8217;t seem to be in any of the information available to the BES 5 beta testers (unless I&#8217;m missing it somewhere).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22159</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/03/23/faq-comparing-bes-50-with-previous-versions/#comment-22159</guid>
		<description>Wow, superb find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, superb find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 422/426 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn3.berryreview.com

Served from: www.berryreview.com @ 2012-02-11 11:35:23 -->
