<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MiaWallpaper Out Of Beta – Automatically Change Your Storm Background With Flickr Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2009/02/20/miawallpaper-out-of-beta-automatically-change-your-storm-background-with-flickr-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/02/20/miawallpaper-out-of-beta-automatically-change-your-storm-background-with-flickr-images/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:25:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2009/02/20/miawallpaper-out-of-beta-automatically-change-your-storm-background-with-flickr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-20412</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2009/02/19/miawallpaper-out-of-beta-automatically-change-your-storm-background-with-flickr-images/#comment-20412</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried it out...it&#039;s sluggish to respond to commands when attempting to make changes to the settings and it would be nice if you could define which photo stream the pictures are coming from. 

I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll be keeping this one, great concept...just needs more flexibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried it out&#8230;it&#8217;s sluggish to respond to commands when attempting to make changes to the settings and it would be nice if you could define which photo stream the pictures are coming from. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll be keeping this one, great concept&#8230;just needs more flexibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
