<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McAfee Releases Mobile Anti-Theft for BlackBerry v. 1.0 BETA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:28:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: McAfee Mobile Antivirus for your BlackBerry? &#124; BerryReview.com &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-14382</link>
		<dc:creator>McAfee Mobile Antivirus for your BlackBerry? &#124; BerryReview.com &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 05:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-14382</guid>
		<description>[...] We know that McAfee may have been working on BlackBerry anti-theft applications, but this is the first concrete thing I have seen. I suppose it was only a matter of time before we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We know that McAfee may have been working on BlackBerry anti-theft applications, but this is the first concrete thing I have seen. I suppose it was only a matter of time before we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13597</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13597</guid>
		<description>This is stupid. Only works if the thief replaces the SIM card, like you average thief knows what the heck a SIM card is, this is worthless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is stupid. Only works if the thief replaces the SIM card, like you average thief knows what the heck a SIM card is, this is worthless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13428</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13428</guid>
		<description>I used and followed the indications for locate my Blackberry trough celltomap but I can´t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used and followed the indications for locate my Blackberry trough celltomap but I can´t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudia</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13417</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13417</guid>
		<description>Is this application workable worldwide as long as in gsm network?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this application workable worldwide as long as in gsm network?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spammy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13410</link>
		<dc:creator>Spammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13410</guid>
		<description>Thomas Tim, it is obvious you work for BAK2u, why don&#039;t you just say so and fill people in instead of pretending to be a regular user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Tim, it is obvious you work for BAK2u, why don&#8217;t you just say so and fill people in instead of pretending to be a regular user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13387</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13387</guid>
		<description>As I said it is probably very new not up yet. It is afterall a trial right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said it is probably very new not up yet. It is afterall a trial right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13385</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13385</guid>
		<description>But when you go to that site there is no mention of Blackberry. So???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But when you go to that site there is no mention of Blackberry. So???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13381</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13381</guid>
		<description>It is from Mcafee afterall. Found this from a search.

Found the link: http://tinyurl.com/3or63a

Has the blackberry image, probably just very new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is from Mcafee afterall. Found this from a search.</p>
<p>Found the link: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3or63a" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3or63a</a></p>
<p>Has the blackberry image, probably just very new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13380</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13380</guid>
		<description>Looks like a trial version by Mcafee but probably powered by bak2u? bak2u is quite strong from the looks on their website covering so many os. 

Getjar.com is a reputatable website and I trust it with many of my applications from there. Should be a mcafee brand and bak2u engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a trial version by Mcafee but probably powered by bak2u? bak2u is quite strong from the looks on their website covering so many os. </p>
<p>Getjar.com is a reputatable website and I trust it with many of my applications from there. Should be a mcafee brand and bak2u engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grivious</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13189</link>
		<dc:creator>grivious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13189</guid>
		<description>Yeah a Google search does not show this anywhere but GetJar, you would think McAfee would make a bigger deal if this was theirs, I don&#039;t think it is. It is either some kind of malware, or some other company trying to make a buck using the McAfee logo, it will probably get taken down soon for trademark violation or something. You would think Getjar would monitor/filter this sort of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah a Google search does not show this anywhere but GetJar, you would think McAfee would make a bigger deal if this was theirs, I don&#8217;t think it is. It is either some kind of malware, or some other company trying to make a buck using the McAfee logo, it will probably get taken down soon for trademark violation or something. You would think Getjar would monitor/filter this sort of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betavirus</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13182</link>
		<dc:creator>betavirus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13182</guid>
		<description>Installed it on an 8310 and it seems to work OK.  Do have some reservations since I can find no information on the McAfee site.  In the about seceen it gives a URL that takes you  back to the main McAfee site.

Sent an inquiry to McAfee about the product.  If I do not get a response back in 24 hrs I will delete it and rtestore my BB back to preinstallation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed it on an 8310 and it seems to work OK.  Do have some reservations since I can find no information on the McAfee site.  In the about seceen it gives a URL that takes you  back to the main McAfee site.</p>
<p>Sent an inquiry to McAfee about the product.  If I do not get a response back in 24 hrs I will delete it and rtestore my BB back to preinstallation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corrina</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13178</link>
		<dc:creator>Corrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13178</guid>
		<description>I just installed it on my 8310 (AT&amp;T) and it works perfectly! Thank you for this post... When it&#039;s out of Beta, I&#039;ll be purchasing it. Between McAfee and Get It Back, I feel pretty secure about getting my Berry back should someone steal it. Of course they&#039;ll have to pry it out of my cold, dead hands first. lol

Link for more info: http://www.getjar.com/products/17242/McAfeeMobileAntiTheftforBlackBerry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just installed it on my 8310 (AT&amp;T) and it works perfectly! Thank you for this post&#8230; When it&#8217;s out of Beta, I&#8217;ll be purchasing it. Between McAfee and Get It Back, I feel pretty secure about getting my Berry back should someone steal it. Of course they&#8217;ll have to pry it out of my cold, dead hands first. lol</p>
<p>Link for more info: <a href="http://www.getjar.com/products/17242/McAfeeMobileAntiTheftforBlackBerry" rel="nofollow">http://www.getjar.com/products/17242/McAfeeMobileAntiTheftforBlackBerry</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13174</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13174</guid>
		<description>Can someone provide a link to the product description for this application? I could not find it on McAfee&#039;s website. This looks cool, but want to learn a bit more before I install it. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone provide a link to the product description for this application? I could not find it on McAfee&#8217;s website. This looks cool, but want to learn a bit more before I install it. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13168</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13168</guid>
		<description>This does not appear to be an official product of McAfee. First, I do not understand why McAfee would release a beta on getjar.com rather than their own site. As a security company, it would seem to contradict their own business model. Second, a quick google of the product and search of the McAfee site shows no such existence of a product in beta. No press releases, nothing. I agree with Rick, this app has trojan written all over it. And as Rick mentioned, if the product was not signed by McAfee, you have to wonder why the product is being pushed under the McAfee brand. I would guess to garner false trust from the community. Install at your own risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does not appear to be an official product of McAfee. First, I do not understand why McAfee would release a beta on getjar.com rather than their own site. As a security company, it would seem to contradict their own business model. Second, a quick google of the product and search of the McAfee site shows no such existence of a product in beta. No press releases, nothing. I agree with Rick, this app has trojan written all over it. And as Rick mentioned, if the product was not signed by McAfee, you have to wonder why the product is being pushed under the McAfee brand. I would guess to garner false trust from the community. Install at your own risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13163</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13163</guid>
		<description>While this sort of thing would be nice for a end user, for someone like Verizon it&#039;s a waste of their time.  Enabling support for such a &quot;customer friendly&quot; class of applications is unlikely to EVER be in the cards from Verizon.  With CDMA, it&#039;s not like you can just pop in a different SIM card and use the device (though I suppose a stolen device could be offloaded in Europe).  Lose your device, and Verizon (or Sprint or Alltel or Telus or whoever) just disables the ESN for that CDMA device and it can no longer do anything but call 911, and YOU either have to buy a replacement device or hope the $50 replacement insurance comes through for you (if you have it!).  There&#039;s no incentive for Verizon to monetize, and as we see with their entire &quot;open&quot; plan it&#039;s all about monetizing.  So, forget ever being able to use this sort of app on Verizon phones...  :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this sort of thing would be nice for a end user, for someone like Verizon it&#8217;s a waste of their time.  Enabling support for such a &#8220;customer friendly&#8221; class of applications is unlikely to EVER be in the cards from Verizon.  With CDMA, it&#8217;s not like you can just pop in a different SIM card and use the device (though I suppose a stolen device could be offloaded in Europe).  Lose your device, and Verizon (or Sprint or Alltel or Telus or whoever) just disables the ESN for that CDMA device and it can no longer do anything but call 911, and YOU either have to buy a replacement device or hope the $50 replacement insurance comes through for you (if you have it!).  There&#8217;s no incentive for Verizon to monetize, and as we see with their entire &#8220;open&#8221; plan it&#8217;s all about monetizing.  So, forget ever being able to use this sort of app on Verizon phones&#8230;  <img src='http://www.berryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hahaha</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13162</link>
		<dc:creator>hahaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13162</guid>
		<description>&quot;recover your precious blackberry from McAfee&quot;

Why, did McAfee stole it from you?

Grammar and punctuation, dear sir....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;recover your precious blackberry from McAfee&#8221;</p>
<p>Why, did McAfee stole it from you?</p>
<p>Grammar and punctuation, dear sir&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmb</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13161</link>
		<dc:creator>pmb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13161</guid>
		<description>&quot;in case you loose it &quot;?

If it&#039;s loose, put some glue on it.

Ah, you mean &quot;LOSE&quot; it.

http://loseloose.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;in case you loose it &#8220;?</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s loose, put some glue on it.</p>
<p>Ah, you mean &#8220;LOSE&#8221; it.</p>
<p><a href="http://loseloose.com/" rel="nofollow">http://loseloose.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13158</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13158</guid>
		<description>OK so I downloaded this and the package names are &quot;PhonebaK&quot; after some searches I found that this is actually traced back to a company in Singapore and not McAfee, the application signature is also signed to a company in Singapore and not McAfee. I am wondering if this is actually McAfee or some sort of trojan. Be careful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK so I downloaded this and the package names are &#8220;PhonebaK&#8221; after some searches I found that this is actually traced back to a company in Singapore and not McAfee, the application signature is also signed to a company in Singapore and not McAfee. I am wondering if this is actually McAfee or some sort of trojan. Be careful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haephaestus</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13157</link>
		<dc:creator>haephaestus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13157</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I wonder if this would be a compelling reason for Verizon to uncripple the GPS. These types of apps are useless for Verizon customers because neither of the two scenarios apply, unless you are using an 8830 which only has the SIM card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I wonder if this would be a compelling reason for Verizon to uncripple the GPS. These types of apps are useless for Verizon customers because neither of the two scenarios apply, unless you are using an 8830 which only has the SIM card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/09/22/mcafee-releases-mobile-anti-theft-for-blackberry-v-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-13148</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=9395#comment-13148</guid>
		<description>These type of applications are of limited use for CDMA devices, especially for Verizon, since

     1) there is typically no SIM card (only for world-edition devices, and that is outside of the US only);

     2) Verizon cripples the GPS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These type of applications are of limited use for CDMA devices, especially for Verizon, since</p>
<p>     1) there is typically no SIM card (only for world-edition devices, and that is outside of the US only);</p>
<p>     2) Verizon cripples the GPS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
