<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motorola Napoleon Q9 &#8211; When You Cant Innovate&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2008/07/07/motorola-napoleon-q9-when-you-cant-innovate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/07/07/motorola-napoleon-q9-when-you-cant-innovate/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:16:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: abcyesn</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/07/07/motorola-napoleon-q9-when-you-cant-innovate/comment-page-1/#comment-17455</link>
		<dc:creator>abcyesn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=6102#comment-17455</guid>
		<description>The Q9 Napoleon might show Motorola&#039;s new direction when it comes to naming its handsets. There are already rumors about a Motorola Alexander, which should bring a wide touchscreen display and a killer-camera of 8 Megapixels. I wonder what&#039;s next: a &quot;Moto Louis XIV&quot;, a &quot;Moto Hammurabi&quot;? Well, the history books are filled with names of ex-kings, so Motorola won&#039;t run out of inspiration in case it goes this way with its naming strategy.
fans site already pop up http://www.napoleon-q9.com see more there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Q9 Napoleon might show Motorola&#8217;s new direction when it comes to naming its handsets. There are already rumors about a Motorola Alexander, which should bring a wide touchscreen display and a killer-camera of 8 Megapixels. I wonder what&#8217;s next: a &#8220;Moto Louis XIV&#8221;, a &#8220;Moto Hammurabi&#8221;? Well, the history books are filled with names of ex-kings, so Motorola won&#8217;t run out of inspiration in case it goes this way with its naming strategy.<br />
fans site already pop up <a href="http://www.napoleon-q9.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.napoleon-q9.com</a> see more there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/07/07/motorola-napoleon-q9-when-you-cant-innovate/comment-page-1/#comment-9764</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=6102#comment-9764</guid>
		<description>Yeah Ronen, I&#039;ve seen the EV-DO roadmap. BUT i&#039;ve seen no indication that either Verizon or Sprint (the biggest North America CDMA carriers) intend to go to anything beyond EV-DO Rev A?  Verizon has said they are going to LTE (GSM&#039;s version of 4G) and Sprint is entrenched in the WiMax camp.  I don&#039;t follow Canada much so not sure what Bell or Telus have planned for beyond Rev A, or what IUSACELL has planned for Mexico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Ronen, I&#8217;ve seen the EV-DO roadmap. BUT i&#8217;ve seen no indication that either Verizon or Sprint (the biggest North America CDMA carriers) intend to go to anything beyond EV-DO Rev A?  Verizon has said they are going to LTE (GSM&#8217;s version of 4G) and Sprint is entrenched in the WiMax camp.  I don&#8217;t follow Canada much so not sure what Bell or Telus have planned for beyond Rev A, or what IUSACELL has planned for Mexico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy R.</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/07/07/motorola-napoleon-q9-when-you-cant-innovate/comment-page-1/#comment-9687</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=6102#comment-9687</guid>
		<description>At this rate, Im thinking about changing to Verizon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this rate, Im thinking about changing to Verizon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronen Halevy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/07/07/motorola-napoleon-q9-when-you-cant-innovate/comment-page-1/#comment-9662</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Halevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=6102#comment-9662</guid>
		<description>David,
That idea is bounced around at this link
http://www.blackberryforums.com/rumor-mill/134144-thunder-dual-mode-ev-do-rev-c-gsm-hspa.html

Rev A is the current standard with BB devices supporting Rev 0 which has more latency and slower uploads. Rev B brings 75Mbps speeds and Rev C brings 280Mbps speeds!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
That idea is bounced around at this link<br />
<a href="http://www.blackberryforums.com/rumor-mill/134144-thunder-dual-mode-ev-do-rev-c-gsm-hspa.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackberryforums.com/rumor-mill/134144-thunder-dual-mode-ev-do-rev-c-gsm-hspa.html</a></p>
<p>Rev A is the current standard with BB devices supporting Rev 0 which has more latency and slower uploads. Rev B brings 75Mbps speeds and Rev C brings 280Mbps speeds!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/07/07/motorola-napoleon-q9-when-you-cant-innovate/comment-page-1/#comment-9659</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/?p=6102#comment-9659</guid>
		<description>Thought I read somewhere (BGR?) that the Thunder is supposed to have &quot;EV-DO Rev C&quot;. And that &quot;no carrier supports that yet&quot;?

Ah well, RIM has never been known for being up to date with the latest gadgetry in their devices.  I guess that&#039;s either good or bad, depending on if you&#039;re a &quot;glass half full&quot; or &quot;glass half empty&quot; type of person...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought I read somewhere (BGR?) that the Thunder is supposed to have &#8220;EV-DO Rev C&#8221;. And that &#8220;no carrier supports that yet&#8221;?</p>
<p>Ah well, RIM has never been known for being up to date with the latest gadgetry in their devices.  I guess that&#8217;s either good or bad, depending on if you&#8217;re a &#8220;glass half full&#8221; or &#8220;glass half empty&#8221; type of person&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
