|
 |
Engadget得到詞 T流動通過培養SMS加入他們的載體教友對估計到$.20每則消息，如果您沒有一個計劃。
這新的率進入作用對8月29日th. 有時您能說服您的載體這些率高漲是物質合同違約，并且他們將放棄您的ETF (早期的終止費)。 這也許是一個完善的方式離開您的T流動合同及時從AT&T得到大膽。 
如果您說服足够，那是。
您能通過跟隨對這個詞條的所有反應 評論飼料. 留下Trackback。.
rndy,
Yes, I completely agree that if you have a package; particularly an unlimited package which seems so prevalent currently, you’re not going to go over and the pricing will not impact you. However, you’re way off base with your completely irrelevant and non-legally valid argument.
Most of the time the legal definition is “materially adverse impact” - what it means is, this is going to impact you negatively. Advance notice does nothing to mitigate this impact althoughit does sound like T-Mobile is trying to go out of it’s way to avoid meeting the “impact” part of the wording.
Well doesnt it say in their contract they can set and raise prices based on something? Maybe its just me and for those who dont have unlimited plan which you would be surprised that alot of people dont have, this is to cover up the 3G network lol.
Mike, read the contract terms. I’m pretty sure it says in there we can change prices without any advance notice, or for tha fact without telling you at all. We’re not only giving you almost a 2 month notice, but also giving you a way to avoid having to worry about any messages ever being charged to your account at all.
rndy,
You may be the first person I have ever witnessed defend a wireless company. You must work for tmobile. BTW, don’t pretend to understand contract law because you definitely don’t. Just continue setting people up with their fave 5 and leave the legal work to the lawyers.
Teej, I deal with people like you who try to find the loop holes everyday. Read section 5 of the contract terms. I doubt any judge or jury or arbitrator is going to deem a 5 cent rate increase with 60+ days notice as “materially adverse”. And you’ll be hard pressed to find a rep that will waive you etf based on such. Especially since you’ll be able to avoid worrying about being charged at all. And I will continue setting people up and telling people like you that I’m sorry, but your charges are valid, you used the service.
I am aware that many of you may be sticking up for the company and saying this isn’t reason enough to get out of a contract, but it is considered materially adverse. No matter how you put it, a 5 cent hike is still a 5 cent hike. And while they may not consider it materially adverse, I may. This is a negative change in the contract and you should be able to opt out for that very reason.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
