<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scheduled Outage: Americas May 25th 2:00 AM Until 6:00 AM (EDT)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2008/05/21/scheduled-outage-americas-may-25th-200-am-until-600-am-edt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/05/21/scheduled-outage-americas-may-25th-200-am-until-600-am-edt/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:45:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/05/21/scheduled-outage-americas-may-25th-200-am-until-600-am-edt/comment-page-1/#comment-7478</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 12:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/05/21/scheduled-outage-americas-may-25th-200-am-until-600-am-edt/#comment-7478</guid>
		<description>100% of GPRS users? Or 100% of North American users? The way I read the advisory it doesn&#039;t apply to EVDO (Sprint, Verizon, Alltel, etc) users??? 

Not that I really care, I expect system upgrades and in the middle of the night on a weekend IS the best time. Heck, maybe they are upgrading to ADD some much needed redundancy to thus reduce future unexpected outages???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% of GPRS users? Or 100% of North American users? The way I read the advisory it doesn&#8217;t apply to EVDO (Sprint, Verizon, Alltel, etc) users??? </p>
<p>Not that I really care, I expect system upgrades and in the middle of the night on a weekend IS the best time. Heck, maybe they are upgrading to ADD some much needed redundancy to thus reduce future unexpected outages???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BB User</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/05/21/scheduled-outage-americas-may-25th-200-am-until-600-am-edt/comment-page-1/#comment-7452</link>
		<dc:creator>BB User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 16:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/05/21/scheduled-outage-americas-may-25th-200-am-until-600-am-edt/#comment-7452</guid>
		<description>What is this...1999? I don&#039;t understand how a company that supports millions of subscribers (and charges a pretty premium to use their service) cannot afford the redundant systems that would be required to keep their users online during system upgrades. I mean really!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this&#8230;1999? I don&#8217;t understand how a company that supports millions of subscribers (and charges a pretty premium to use their service) cannot afford the redundant systems that would be required to keep their users online during system upgrades. I mean really!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
