<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlackBerry 9000 Forward Facing Camera.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/16/blackberry-9000-forward-facing-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/16/blackberry-9000-forward-facing-camera/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CybaCowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/16/blackberry-9000-forward-facing-camera/#comment-2929</link>
		<dc:creator>CybaCowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/16/blackberry-9000-forward-facing-camera/#comment-2929</guid>
		<description>If you look at the various photos of the "BlackBerry 9000" online, there doesn't appear to be a "front-facing camera" in any of them...

It's true, some 3G/UMTS phones have pretty discreet front-facing cameras, but I can't even see what MIGHT be a "front-facing camera" on the "BlackBerry 9000".


It's hard to say though - whilst video-calling isn't the "killer application" that it was hoped it would be, it is still pretty popular and is becomming more popular as users realize the benefits of such a feature (eg. Calling long-distance relatives)... If RIM wants to keep chasing the consumer market, video-call capabilities might just be on the cards.


Personally though, I think Research in Motion (RIM) will be reluctant to offer a video-call capable device - RIM devices traditionally have the some of best usage times around and whilst 3G/UMTS usage times HAVE improved significantly, they're still a LONG way off the usage times that existing BlackBerry users have come to expect...



~ Posted wirelessly from my BlackBerry 8800 ~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the various photos of the &#8220;BlackBerry 9000&#8243; online, there doesn&#8217;t appear to be a &#8220;front-facing camera&#8221; in any of them&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true, some 3G/UMTS phones have pretty discreet front-facing cameras, but I can&#8217;t even see what MIGHT be a &#8220;front-facing camera&#8221; on the &#8220;BlackBerry 9000&#8243;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to say though - whilst video-calling isn&#8217;t the &#8220;killer application&#8221; that it was hoped it would be, it is still pretty popular and is becomming more popular as users realize the benefits of such a feature (eg. Calling long-distance relatives)&#8230; If RIM wants to keep chasing the consumer market, video-call capabilities might just be on the cards.</p>
<p>Personally though, I think Research in Motion (RIM) will be reluctant to offer a video-call capable device - RIM devices traditionally have the some of best usage times around and whilst 3G/UMTS usage times HAVE improved significantly, they&#8217;re still a LONG way off the usage times that existing BlackBerry users have come to expect&#8230;</p>
<p>~ Posted wirelessly from my BlackBerry 8800 ~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Myers</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/16/blackberry-9000-forward-facing-camera/#comment-2917</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/16/blackberry-9000-forward-facing-camera/#comment-2917</guid>
		<description>DavidB,
Mate, perfect, could not have said it better myself...
KR
Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DavidB,<br />
Mate, perfect, could not have said it better myself&#8230;<br />
KR<br />
Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raffy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/16/blackberry-9000-forward-facing-camera/#comment-2912</link>
		<dc:creator>Raffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/16/blackberry-9000-forward-facing-camera/#comment-2912</guid>
		<description>maybe not... there have been reports from other folks who say they've got their mitts on the new BlackBerry, and they suggest the device has some battery issues


http://advice.cio.com/al_sacco/rim_blackberry_9000_sneak_peek_front_facing_camera_videoconferencing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe not&#8230; there have been reports from other folks who say they&#8217;ve got their mitts on the new BlackBerry, and they suggest the device has some battery issues</p>
<p><a href="http://advice.cio.com/al_sacco/rim_blackberry_9000_sneak_peek_front_facing_camera_videoconferencing" rel="nofollow">http://advice.cio.com/al_sacco/rim_blackberry_9000_sneak_peek_front_facing_camera_videoconferencing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/16/blackberry-9000-forward-facing-camera/#comment-2910</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/16/blackberry-9000-forward-facing-camera/#comment-2910</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...
Neato gee whiz cool and all. Me, I'd prefer a non-camera 88xx device with GPS, 3G, and no OS memory leak!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;<br />
Neato gee whiz cool and all. Me, I&#8217;d prefer a non-camera 88xx device with GPS, 3G, and no OS memory leak!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
