Comments on: Google Talk Issues - Version 2.0.43 Available http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/07/google-talk-issues-version-2043-available/ BlackBerry News and Reviews Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:44:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Google Talk Updated To 2.0.46 - No Idea Why… | BerryReview http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/07/google-talk-issues-version-2043-available/#comment-7014 Google Talk Updated To 2.0.46 - No Idea Why… | BerryReview Wed, 07 May 2008 14:44:54 +0000 http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/07/google-talk-issues-version-2043-available/#comment-7014 [...] that there is a new version of the official Google Talk Client for BlackBerry. The version has been updated from 2.0.43 to the latest [...] [...] that there is a new version of the official Google Talk Client for BlackBerry. The version has been updated from 2.0.43 to the latest [...]

]]> By: Luciano ES http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/07/google-talk-issues-version-2043-available/#comment-2667 Luciano ES Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:28:07 +0000 http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/07/google-talk-issues-version-2043-available/#comment-2667 I'm still using 2.0.33. No problem whatsoever. I’m still using 2.0.33. No problem whatsoever.

]]> By: Matt http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/07/google-talk-issues-version-2043-available/#comment-2666 Matt Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:22:16 +0000 http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/07/google-talk-issues-version-2043-available/#comment-2666 I have install this new version and I don't have problem with connecting to it... I have install this new version and I don’t have problem with connecting to it…

]]> By: Scott http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/07/google-talk-issues-version-2043-available/#comment-2658 Scott Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:36:10 +0000 http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/07/google-talk-issues-version-2043-available/#comment-2658 I know exactly what your problem is... You don't have Jivetalk. ;-) Seriously though, maybe that would fix the problem. I know exactly what your problem is… You don’t have Jivetalk. ;-)

Seriously though, maybe that would fix the problem.

]]>