<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SnapScreen &#8211; On Device Screenshot Utility Does Exist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/03/snapscreen-on-device-screenshot-utility-does-exist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/03/snapscreen-on-device-screenshot-utility-does-exist/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:14:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: SnapScreen On Device Screenshots Now Works With OS 4.2.2+ &#124; BerryReview</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/03/snapscreen-on-device-screenshot-utility-does-exist/#comment-7623</link>
		<dc:creator>SnapScreen On Device Screenshots Now Works With OS 4.2.2+ &#124; BerryReview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/03/snapscreen-on-device-screenshot-utility-does-exist/#comment-7623</guid>
		<description>[...] of you may remember when we first mentioned SnapScreen as a on device screenshot application. The problem was that the application was limited to OS 4.3+. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of you may remember when we first mentioned SnapScreen as a on device screenshot application. The problem was that the application was limited to OS 4.3+. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronen Halevy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/03/snapscreen-on-device-screenshot-utility-does-exist/#comment-2591</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Halevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/03/snapscreen-on-device-screenshot-utility-does-exist/#comment-2591</guid>
		<description>Yeah I still stick to BBscreenshooter BBstream and tried ROVE&#039;s Mobile Viewer. I havent seen much else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I still stick to BBscreenshooter BBstream and tried ROVE&#8217;s Mobile Viewer. I havent seen much else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notesboy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/03/snapscreen-on-device-screenshot-utility-does-exist/#comment-2590</link>
		<dc:creator>notesboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/04/03/snapscreen-on-device-screenshot-utility-does-exist/#comment-2590</guid>
		<description>there are tons of free screen capture utilities of the BB available out there there are some that u can even capture a movie of all the moves you make on the BB. and the adv is that they are all done frm the PC so its pretty slick. I do have some screen shots on my site of the 4.5 OS using one of these tools</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are tons of free screen capture utilities of the BB available out there there are some that u can even capture a movie of all the moves you make on the BB. and the adv is that they are all done frm the PC so its pretty slick. I do have some screen shots on my site of the 4.5 OS using one of these tools</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 286/290 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn3.berryreview.com

Served from: www.berryreview.com @ 2012-02-11 22:02:12 -->
