<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Trying To Push Safari On All iPod Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/24/apple-trying-to-push-safari-on-all-ipod-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/24/apple-trying-to-push-safari-on-all-ipod-users/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:26:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: portorikan</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/24/apple-trying-to-push-safari-on-all-ipod-users/comment-page-1/#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>portorikan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/24/apple-trying-to-push-safari-on-all-ipod-users/#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what the hubbub is all about. It seems like everybody does this. Firefox, Adobe, MS, Apple. Like Dnszero said, it&#039;s an option you can deselect. I don&#039;t think anybody is really getting fooled here.

I didn&#039;t know about the update because I autumatically updated it as soon as I knew it was available. I was already running the beta. It&#039;s a great browser and I don&#039;t see why not try something a little different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what the hubbub is all about. It seems like everybody does this. Firefox, Adobe, MS, Apple. Like Dnszero said, it&#8217;s an option you can deselect. I don&#8217;t think anybody is really getting fooled here.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know about the update because I autumatically updated it as soon as I knew it was available. I was already running the beta. It&#8217;s a great browser and I don&#8217;t see why not try something a little different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luciano ES</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/24/apple-trying-to-push-safari-on-all-ipod-users/comment-page-1/#comment-2342</link>
		<dc:creator>Luciano ES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/24/apple-trying-to-push-safari-on-all-ipod-users/#comment-2342</guid>
		<description>The gist of this story is that we should never trust default options from any company whatsoever. Such is the relationship we have with companies these days: besides parting with money, we have to be constantly looking over our shoulder whenever we do business with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gist of this story is that we should never trust default options from any company whatsoever. Such is the relationship we have with companies these days: besides parting with money, we have to be constantly looking over our shoulder whenever we do business with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronen Halevy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/24/apple-trying-to-push-safari-on-all-ipod-users/comment-page-1/#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Halevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/24/apple-trying-to-push-safari-on-all-ipod-users/#comment-2337</guid>
		<description>As I said two sides of the same coin. While it may not be a evil piece of software it is still trying to slip something under the radar. Almost like microsoft slipping silverlight in windows update... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said two sides of the same coin. While it may not be a evil piece of software it is still trying to slip something under the radar. Almost like microsoft slipping silverlight in windows update&#8230; <img src='http://www.berryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dnszero</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/24/apple-trying-to-push-safari-on-all-ipod-users/comment-page-1/#comment-2325</link>
		<dc:creator>Dnszero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/24/apple-trying-to-push-safari-on-all-ipod-users/#comment-2325</guid>
		<description>It IS a ludicrous &quot;update&quot; for iTunes, but the update tool does blatantly list Safari as an item which can be deselected from the update process.

If you&#039;re just going to blindly install updates, some might say you get what you deserve.

OTOH, it IS just a browser. We&#039;re not talking about evil spyware secretly installed behind the scenes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It IS a ludicrous &#8220;update&#8221; for iTunes, but the update tool does blatantly list Safari as an item which can be deselected from the update process.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re just going to blindly install updates, some might say you get what you deserve.</p>
<p>OTOH, it IS just a browser. We&#8217;re not talking about evil spyware secretly installed behind the scenes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
