<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIM Trying To Come Up With A Solution To Secure Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/11/rim-trying-to-come-up-with-a-solution-to-secure-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/11/rim-trying-to-come-up-with-a-solution-to-secure-camera/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:03:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronen Halevy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/11/rim-trying-to-come-up-with-a-solution-to-secure-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-2173</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Halevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/11/rim-trying-to-come-up-with-a-solution-to-secure-camera/#comment-2173</guid>
		<description>Yeah it kind of made me laugh that they even bothered patenting such a solution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it kind of made me laugh that they even bothered patenting such a solution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/11/rim-trying-to-come-up-with-a-solution-to-secure-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-2117</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/11/rim-trying-to-come-up-with-a-solution-to-secure-camera/#comment-2117</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see the &quot;key&quot; working for we who are prohibited from having cameras. First off, what security guy is going to put his job on the line believing the &quot;key&quot; disabled the camera, and second, I see little likelihood the &quot;keys&quot; could be sufficiently protected for security types to accept that you couldbt have another key in your pocket or such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the &#8220;key&#8221; working for we who are prohibited from having cameras. First off, what security guy is going to put his job on the line believing the &#8220;key&#8221; disabled the camera, and second, I see little likelihood the &#8220;keys&#8221; could be sufficiently protected for security types to accept that you couldbt have another key in your pocket or such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
