<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone Making An Enterprise Debut? Should RIM Care?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/05/iphone-making-an-enterprise-debut-should-rim-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/05/iphone-making-an-enterprise-debut-should-rim-care/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:20:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronen Halevy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/05/iphone-making-an-enterprise-debut-should-rim-care/comment-page-1/#comment-2019</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Halevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/05/iphone-making-an-enterprise-debut-should-rim-care/#comment-2019</guid>
		<description>Totally agree on both points. I could live without HTML emails but would it kill them to improve the browser?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree on both points. I could live without HTML emails but would it kill them to improve the browser?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/05/iphone-making-an-enterprise-debut-should-rim-care/comment-page-1/#comment-1997</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/05/iphone-making-an-enterprise-debut-should-rim-care/#comment-1997</guid>
		<description>BBSmart meets my limited HTML needs. 

I find the BB Browser to be and endless source of frustration. And sorry, without an ability to fully integrate, Opera Mobile isn&#039;t a viable alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBSmart meets my limited HTML needs. </p>
<p>I find the BB Browser to be and endless source of frustration. And sorry, without an ability to fully integrate, Opera Mobile isn&#8217;t a viable alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luciano ES</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/05/iphone-making-an-enterprise-debut-should-rim-care/comment-page-1/#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>Luciano ES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/03/05/iphone-making-an-enterprise-debut-should-rim-care/#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>I think the iPhone is A TOY. It flips-flaps through pictures and album covers, but after four firmware revisions, it still has no copy-and-paste. It&#039;s a toy. It demands not to be taken seriously.
.
Come on, the Blackberry browser is not that bad. The iPhone Safari is better, but it downloads entire desktop version pages. That must take like forever on EDGE. And we&#039;re still stuck to small screens for a long time, so downloading full desktop version pages with a phone still makes no sense whatsoever until RIM cranks out some 3,5&quot; screen models. What the Blackberry and Opera do still is the sane option: generate trimmed-down versions on the fly and keep some &quot;wait&quot; out of &quot;www&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the iPhone is A TOY. It flips-flaps through pictures and album covers, but after four firmware revisions, it still has no copy-and-paste. It&#8217;s a toy. It demands not to be taken seriously.<br />
.<br />
Come on, the Blackberry browser is not that bad. The iPhone Safari is better, but it downloads entire desktop version pages. That must take like forever on EDGE. And we&#8217;re still stuck to small screens for a long time, so downloading full desktop version pages with a phone still makes no sense whatsoever until RIM cranks out some 3,5&#8243; screen models. What the Blackberry and Opera do still is the sane option: generate trimmed-down versions on the fly and keep some &#8220;wait&#8221; out of &#8220;www&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
