<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atheros Selling WiFi Chips To RIM?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2008/02/28/atheros-selling-wifi-chips-to-rim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/02/28/atheros-selling-wifi-chips-to-rim/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:43:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronen Halevy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/02/28/atheros-selling-wifi-chips-to-rim/comment-page-1/#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Halevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 18:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/02/28/atheros-selling-wifi-chips-to-rim/#comment-1934</guid>
		<description>RIM has really been ignoring the CDMA side of things. That is the reason I have never owned a CDMA device. They are just so far behind the curve. I find it is like the difference between Windows &amp; Mac. They both do more or less the same thing but everything comes out for windows first. Even though the Mac may be more stable and reliable. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIM has really been ignoring the CDMA side of things. That is the reason I have never owned a CDMA device. They are just so far behind the curve. I find it is like the difference between Windows &#038; Mac. They both do more or less the same thing but everything comes out for windows first. Even though the Mac may be more stable and reliable. <img src='http://www.berryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/02/28/atheros-selling-wifi-chips-to-rim/comment-page-1/#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/02/28/atheros-selling-wifi-chips-to-rim/#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>Maybe that new slider RIM filed for patent on will have CDMA and wifi and come out same time or before a GSM version??? Sure would be nice to see RIM give CDMA devices some lovin&#039; for once. We waited how long for 8130? And 8830? And still no word of 8330?  When is RIM gonna get smart and realize that CDMA providers have far more 3G coverage here in USA, and that they are losing a LOT of sales with their CDMA delays???

Of course, a 3G GSM BB would be nice too for the GSM crowd that RIM also ignores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe that new slider RIM filed for patent on will have CDMA and wifi and come out same time or before a GSM version??? Sure would be nice to see RIM give CDMA devices some lovin&#8217; for once. We waited how long for 8130? And 8830? And still no word of 8330?  When is RIM gonna get smart and realize that CDMA providers have far more 3G coverage here in USA, and that they are losing a LOT of sales with their CDMA delays???</p>
<p>Of course, a 3G GSM BB would be nice too for the GSM crowd that RIM also ignores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
