<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raketu &#8211; Another VOIP Application For BlackBerry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2008/01/10/raketu-another-voip-application-for-blackberry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/01/10/raketu-another-voip-application-for-blackberry/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:14:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Raketu Switches to Social Networking&#8230; &#124; BerryReview</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/01/10/raketu-another-voip-application-for-blackberry/#comment-8228</link>
		<dc:creator>Raketu Switches to Social Networking&#8230; &#124; BerryReview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/01/10/raketu-another-voip-application-for-blackberry/#comment-8228</guid>
		<description>[...] one is a bit of a turnaround. After launching in January at CES as a VOIP competitor Raketu is now touting itself as a Social Network for BlackBerry with VOIP. I&#8217;m [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one is a bit of a turnaround. After launching in January at CES as a VOIP competitor Raketu is now touting itself as a Social Network for BlackBerry with VOIP. I&#8217;m [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luc-mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/01/10/raketu-another-voip-application-for-blackberry/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>luc-mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/01/10/raketu-another-voip-application-for-blackberry/#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>Damn, I couldn&#039;t wait. The whole description of services in the Web site was way too exciting for me to pass. So I made an account...
.
The good:
+ VERY cheap rates, lower than Skype!
+ Nice special rates/conditions for Raketu-to-Raketu calls.
+ Powerful integration of features (VoIP, SMS, multi-protocol IM etc.) But that&#039;s just on their desktop application.
+ They really try to help you use the service. If your phone doesn&#039;t have a browser, you still can request calls via SMS.
+ Great cartoons.  :-)
.
The bad (let&#039;s get this over with already):
- Very cheap rates indeed, but Raketu requires callbacks, so every call in fact incurs the cost of two calls, just like Skype or Jajah.
- There is no Blackberry app! They try to put all the spin and make it sound like it&#039;s very convenient, but it isn&#039;t since there is no integration with the phone&#039;s address book. We have to open the site, log in, then fill in a Web form with the two phone numbers we want to connect. An-noy-ing! The site provides its own phone book, but I&#039;m sick of apps and services that think it is reasonable for me to keep replicating my address book hither and thither. I am NOT going to be filling yet another one. And their cookie jar needs some fixing, cos I explored their site for one minute, clicked a link to http://BlackBerry.raketu.com and had to log in *again*! Ex-tra an-noy-ing!
- The desktop application runs on Windows only. They promise Mac and Linux (yeah, right!) versions sometime one of these days, but I will not hold my breath.
- Credits expire in 3 months (versus 6 months with Skype).
.
.
That is why competition is never enough. This match is badly tied!
For an occasional caller like me, the lack of address book integration might not be such a big deal, but the short 3-month expiration period pushes me towards Skype. The only Skype application for Blackberry (IM+ for Skype) costs $25 though, which makes me pick neither Skype nor Raketu, I buy international calling cards. The rates aren&#039;t very attractive and dialing is a pain, but very rarely have I ever needed to place an international call from the streets with my cell phone. I can&#039;t justify the upfront $25.
For a very frequent caller, the 3-month expiration period should be no problem, but the lack of address book integration certainly is a major obstacle. A frequent caller should definitely go with IM+ for Skype. It is a lot more convenient.
.
Everyone should keep an eye on Raketu, though. It still sounds very promising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, I couldn&#8217;t wait. The whole description of services in the Web site was way too exciting for me to pass. So I made an account&#8230;<br />
.<br />
The good:<br />
+ VERY cheap rates, lower than Skype!<br />
+ Nice special rates/conditions for Raketu-to-Raketu calls.<br />
+ Powerful integration of features (VoIP, SMS, multi-protocol IM etc.) But that&#8217;s just on their desktop application.<br />
+ They really try to help you use the service. If your phone doesn&#8217;t have a browser, you still can request calls via SMS.<br />
+ Great cartoons.  <img src='http://cdn3.berryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
.<br />
The bad (let&#8217;s get this over with already):<br />
- Very cheap rates indeed, but Raketu requires callbacks, so every call in fact incurs the cost of two calls, just like Skype or Jajah.<br />
- There is no Blackberry app! They try to put all the spin and make it sound like it&#8217;s very convenient, but it isn&#8217;t since there is no integration with the phone&#8217;s address book. We have to open the site, log in, then fill in a Web form with the two phone numbers we want to connect. An-noy-ing! The site provides its own phone book, but I&#8217;m sick of apps and services that think it is reasonable for me to keep replicating my address book hither and thither. I am NOT going to be filling yet another one. And their cookie jar needs some fixing, cos I explored their site for one minute, clicked a link to <a href="http://BlackBerry.raketu.com" rel="nofollow">http://BlackBerry.raketu.com</a> and had to log in *again*! Ex-tra an-noy-ing!<br />
- The desktop application runs on Windows only. They promise Mac and Linux (yeah, right!) versions sometime one of these days, but I will not hold my breath.<br />
- Credits expire in 3 months (versus 6 months with Skype).<br />
.<br />
.<br />
That is why competition is never enough. This match is badly tied!<br />
For an occasional caller like me, the lack of address book integration might not be such a big deal, but the short 3-month expiration period pushes me towards Skype. The only Skype application for Blackberry (IM+ for Skype) costs $25 though, which makes me pick neither Skype nor Raketu, I buy international calling cards. The rates aren&#8217;t very attractive and dialing is a pain, but very rarely have I ever needed to place an international call from the streets with my cell phone. I can&#8217;t justify the upfront $25.<br />
For a very frequent caller, the 3-month expiration period should be no problem, but the lack of address book integration certainly is a major obstacle. A frequent caller should definitely go with IM+ for Skype. It is a lot more convenient.<br />
.<br />
Everyone should keep an eye on Raketu, though. It still sounds very promising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luc-mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2008/01/10/raketu-another-voip-application-for-blackberry/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>luc-mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 03:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2008/01/10/raketu-another-voip-application-for-blackberry/#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have time to check this new VoIP service out (or the 3utelecom.com service you recommended in that other post - how do we make hyperlinks in this comment box?), but for now I can say that Gizmo is not the most usable option out there. AFAIC, it really wants a direct TCP connection, so BIS users like me are simply out of luck. Even if you do have a direct TCP connection, a quick visit to the gizmo5.com forums will reveal a remarkable number of issues disappointing the eager adopters.
.
I know nothing about EQO and Packet8, gotta check them out too when I get some time. My gripe with Jajah is that it doesn&#039;t accept Paypal. NO WAY I&#039;m going to give my credit card number to a company I know so little about. Apart from that, I really like the concept.
.
Anyway, my point is that you can&#039;t have too much competition.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have time to check this new VoIP service out (or the 3utelecom.com service you recommended in that other post &#8211; how do we make hyperlinks in this comment box?), but for now I can say that Gizmo is not the most usable option out there. AFAIC, it really wants a direct TCP connection, so BIS users like me are simply out of luck. Even if you do have a direct TCP connection, a quick visit to the gizmo5.com forums will reveal a remarkable number of issues disappointing the eager adopters.<br />
.<br />
I know nothing about EQO and Packet8, gotta check them out too when I get some time. My gripe with Jajah is that it doesn&#8217;t accept Paypal. NO WAY I&#8217;m going to give my credit card number to a company I know so little about. Apart from that, I really like the concept.<br />
.<br />
Anyway, my point is that you can&#8217;t have too much competition.  <img src='http://cdn3.berryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 294/298 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn3.berryreview.com

Served from: www.berryreview.com @ 2012-02-11 21:20:07 -->
