Wolfe Calls “BS” On Consumer Reports Rating Of BlackBerrys沃爾夫所謂的“學士”對消費者的報告評級在Blackberrys
Alexander Wolfe of InformationWeek has written a great editorial on the recent comparison Consumer Reports did on smartphones亞歷山大沃爾夫的信息周刊寫了一個偉大的編輯就最近比較消費者報告沒有對智能手機 . 。 His claim is that Consumer Reports has rated the BlackBerry completely out of sync with reality. The BlackBerry is rated #7 in the full list of smartphone ratings way below the Windows Mobile devices such as the Q, Treo, and BlackJack.他聲稱是消費者報告已評為黑莓完全失控的同步與現實。 黑莓被評為＃ 7在的完整清單，智能手機收視率遠遠低於Windows移動設備，如Q值，商品，和21點。 It is also below the iPhone.這是也低於擁有。 The Consumer Reports article is not online but Wolfe linked to the消費者報告的文章是不在線上，但沃爾夫連接到 Daily News summary每日新聞摘要 . 。
I completely agree with Wolfe and was also surprised when I read the article in my copy of Consumer Reports.我完全同意，沃爾夫和也奇怪，當我閱讀文章在我的副本，消費者的報告。 It is just shocking that such buggy devices as the BlackJack and the Q get higher ratings than any other BlackBerry device.這只是令人震驚的是，這種漏洞百出的設備作為點和Q獲得更高的收視率比其他任何Blackberry設備。 To quote the tag line of the most recent copy of Fortune Magazine “ What were these guys smoking?”. Seriously how can the BlackBerry be rated below the iPhone, Palm Treo 755P, Samsung Blackjack, Motorola Q, and the Treo 680.引用標記線的最近期的一份財富雜誌“ 是什麼，這些傢伙吸煙？ ” 。認真又如何能黑莓評為低於擁有，的Palm Treo 755p ，三星Blackjack在，摩托羅拉的Q和Treo 680智能手機。 If you have ever used a Windows Mobile device you will understand what I mean. 如果您有任何時候都採用了Windows Mobile裝置，你會明白我的意思。 Just read 剛才所宣讀的 Greg’s editorial on preaching to the converted 格雷格的社論的說教，以轉換 and see what frustration comes with a WM device. 看看來的挫折與西醫結合的裝置。
To sum it all up I have to quote Wolfe:總結這一切了，我要引述沃爾夫：
I defy anyone to prove that BlackBerrys aren’ta better deal. i 藐視任何人證明，在Blackberrys aren'ta更好地處理。 They’re almost always cheaper , they always work , and you don’t have to worry about your carrier or the manufacturing 他們幾乎總是便宜的 ，他們總是工作 ，您不必擔心您的承運人或製造業 locking the thing 鎖定的事 up on you. 成立於您。
You can follow any responses to this entry through the您可以按照任何的反應，此項目通過 Comments Feed 評論飼料 . 。 Leave A Trackback. 留下一個跟踪。 . 。
Previous Post: 先前的文章： Opinion: Preaching To The Converted - By Greg意見：說教，以轉換-由G reg »
Next Post: 明年帖子： MiniMoni Beta - Monitor & Track Your Data Usage Free minimoni試用版-監控與追踪您的數據使用免費 »
Related Reading: 相關閱讀：
- RIM To Release 4-5 New BlackBerrys in 2008!環釋放4月5日在Blackberrys在2008年！
- Exclusive Interview With Magmic - What’s Coming In 2008!獨家專訪magmic -什麼的未來在2 008年！
- Atheros Selling WiFi Chips To RIM? Atheros的無線芯片的銷售RIM公司？
- Cellphone-Wallpapers.net - Tons Of Free Wallpapers手機wallpapers.net -噸的免費桌面牆紙
- Free AT&T Bottom Zen Theme For 8300 & 8800免費AT ＆ T的底部禪宗的主題為8300 ＆ 8800
- Fathers Day Sale!父親每天出售！ 15% OFF All Software Until June 17th 15折的所有軟件，直到6月17日
- RIM Details Steps For Selling & Buying A Used BlackBerry RIM公司的細節步驟，售賣及購買使用黑莓
- RIM Takes Down OS 4.5.0.37 Beta From Partners Website RIM公司需要減少操作系統的測試版4.5.0.37從合作夥伴的網站
December 17th, 2007 12:23 2007年12月17日12時23分
I’m glad that somebody else noticed this.我很高興別人注意到這一點。 Actually it seems that Consumer Reports is nearly always off when it comes to wireless phones AND wireless service.其實，它似乎認為，消費者的報告是幾乎總是小康，當談到無線手機和無線服務。 Seriously, I get customers all the time who come in and say that this phone or that phone was rated very well in Consumer Reports.嚴重的是，我得到顧客的所有時間來誰在和說，這手機或電話被評為非常好，消費者的報告。 Usually it’s an LG, which in my experience last about 12 mos.通常它的一LG電子，這在我的經驗，去年大約有12馬鞍山。 on average.就平均水平。 Do some research for yourself, go look at some old articles, you’ll be amused.做一些研究，為自己，去看看一些老的文章，您將有趣。
December 17th, 2007 17:25 2007年12月17日17時25分
Sean,肖恩，
I agree.我同意這一點。 I was baffled when I read the consumer reports article.我是莫名其妙當我看到消費者報告的文章。 It made me ashamed to have a subscription.它使我感到慚愧有一個訂閱。 Who did this research already?誰這樣做的研究已經？ You need to go no further than this article released recently to see:你需要去沒有進一步的比這條最近發表的看到：
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/12/14/canalys-symbian-apple-iphone-already-leads-windows-mobile-in-us-market-share-q3-2007/