Wolfe Calls “BS” On Consumer Reports Rating Of BlackBerrys沃尔夫所谓的“学士”对消费者的报告评级在Blackberrys
Alexander Wolfe of InformationWeek has written a great editorial on the recent comparison Consumer Reports did on smartphones亚历山大沃尔夫的信息周刊写了一个伟大的编辑就最近比较消费者报告没有对智能手机 . 。 His claim is that Consumer Reports has rated the BlackBerry completely out of sync with reality. The BlackBerry is rated #7 in the full list of smartphone ratings way below the Windows Mobile devices such as the Q, Treo, and BlackJack.他声称是消费者报告已评为黑莓完全失控的同步与现实。 黑莓被评为＃ 7在的完整清单，智能手机收视率远远低于Windows移动设备，如Q值，商品，和21点。 It is also below the iPhone.这是也低于拥有。 The Consumer Reports article is not online but Wolfe linked to the消费者报告的文章是不在线上，但沃尔夫连接到 Daily News summary每日新闻摘要 . 。
I completely agree with Wolfe and was also surprised when I read the article in my copy of Consumer Reports.我完全同意，沃尔夫和也奇怪，当我阅读文章在我的副本，消费者的报告。 It is just shocking that such buggy devices as the BlackJack and the Q get higher ratings than any other BlackBerry device.这只是令人震惊的是，这种漏洞百出的设备作为点和Q获得更高的收视率比其他任何Blackberry设备。 To quote the tag line of the most recent copy of Fortune Magazine “ What were these guys smoking?”. Seriously how can the BlackBerry be rated below the iPhone, Palm Treo 755P, Samsung Blackjack, Motorola Q, and the Treo 680.引用标记线的最近期的一份财富杂志“ 是什么，这些家伙吸烟？ ” 。认真又如何能黑莓评为低于拥有，的Palm Treo 755p ，三星Blackjack在，摩托罗拉的Q和Treo 680智能手机。 If you have ever used a Windows Mobile device you will understand what I mean. 如果您有任何时候都采用了Windows Mobile装置，你会明白我的意思。 Just read 刚才所宣读的 Greg’s editorial on preaching to the converted 格雷格的社论的说教，以转换 and see what frustration comes with a WM device. 看看来的挫折与西医结合的装置。
To sum it all up I have to quote Wolfe:总结这一切了，我要引述沃尔夫：
I defy anyone to prove that BlackBerrys aren’ta better deal. i 藐视任何人证明，在Blackberrys aren'ta更好地处理。 They’re almost always cheaper , they always work , and you don’t have to worry about your carrier or the manufacturing 他们几乎总是便宜的 ，他们总是工作 ，您不必担心您的承运人或制造业 locking the thing 锁定的事 up on you. 成立于您。
You can follow any responses to this entry through the您可以按照任何的反应，此项目通过 Comments Feed 评论饲料 . 。 Leave A Trackback. 留下一个跟踪。 . 。
Previous Post: 先前的文章： Opinion: Preaching To The Converted - By Greg意见：说教，以转换-由G reg »
Next Post: 明年帖子： MiniMoni Beta - Monitor & Track Your Data Usage Free minimoni试用版-监控与追踪您的数据使用免费 »
Related Reading: 相关阅读：
- RIM To Release 4-5 New BlackBerrys in 2008!环释放4月5日在Blackberrys在2008年！
- Exclusive Interview With Magmic - What’s Coming In 2008!独家专访magmic -什么的未来在2 008年！
- Atheros Selling WiFi Chips To RIM? Atheros的无线芯片的销售RIM公司？
- Another Americas Outage June 14th & 15th - BIS另一个美洲停电6月14日及15日-之二
- 2 New FREE ‘Bottom Zen’ Themes from NancyDrew二，新的免费'底部的禅宗'的主题，从nancydrew
- Pre-Paid Solution for BIS in Indonesia.预付费解决方案之二在印尼。
- Great Free BlackBerry Wallpapers From BBextras伟大的免费黑莓壁纸从bbextras
- Bplay Releases The Incredible Hulk For BlackBerry bplay新闻稿难以置信的废船黑莓
December 17th, 2007 12:23 2007年12月17日12时23分
I’m glad that somebody else noticed this.我很高兴别人注意到这一点。 Actually it seems that Consumer Reports is nearly always off when it comes to wireless phones AND wireless service.其实，它似乎认为，消费者的报告是几乎总是小康，当谈到无线手机和无线服务。 Seriously, I get customers all the time who come in and say that this phone or that phone was rated very well in Consumer Reports.严重的是，我得到顾客的所有时间来谁在和说，这手机或电话被评为非常好，消费者的报告。 Usually it’s an LG, which in my experience last about 12 mos.通常它的一LG电子，这在我的经验，去年大约有12马鞍山。 on average.就平均水平。 Do some research for yourself, go look at some old articles, you’ll be amused.做一些研究，为自己，去看看一些老的文章，您将有趣。
December 17th, 2007 17:25 2007年12月17日17时25分
Sean,肖恩，
I agree.我同意这一点。 I was baffled when I read the consumer reports article.我是莫名其妙当我看到消费者报告的文章。 It made me ashamed to have a subscription.它使我感到惭愧有一个订阅。 Who did this research already?谁这样做的研究已经？ You need to go no further than this article released recently to see:你需要去没有进一步的比这条最近发表的看到：
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/12/14/canalys-symbian-apple-iphone-already-leads-windows-mobile-in-us-market-share-q3-2007/