<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolfe Calls &#8220;BS&#8221; On Consumer Reports Rating Of BlackBerrys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2007/12/17/wolfe-calls-bs-on-consumer-reports-rating-of-blackberrys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2007/12/17/wolfe-calls-bs-on-consumer-reports-rating-of-blackberrys/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:45:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronen Halevy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2007/12/17/wolfe-calls-bs-on-consumer-reports-rating-of-blackberrys/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Halevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2007/12/17/wolfe-calls-bs-on-consumer-reports-rating-of-blackberrys/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Sean,
I agree. I was baffled when I read the consumer reports article. It made me ashamed to have a subscription. Who did this research already? You need to go no further than this article released recently to see:
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/12/14/canalys-symbian-apple-iphone-already-leads-windows-mobile-in-us-market-share-q3-2007/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,<br />
I agree. I was baffled when I read the consumer reports article. It made me ashamed to have a subscription. Who did this research already? You need to go no further than this article released recently to see:<br />
<a href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/12/14/canalys-symbian-apple-iphone-already-leads-windows-mobile-in-us-market-share-q3-2007/" rel="nofollow">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/12/14/canalys-symbian-apple-iphone-already-leads-windows-mobile-in-us-market-share-q3-2007/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Doyel</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2007/12/17/wolfe-calls-bs-on-consumer-reports-rating-of-blackberrys/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Doyel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2007/12/17/wolfe-calls-bs-on-consumer-reports-rating-of-blackberrys/#comment-757</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that somebody else noticed this.  Actually it seems that Consumer Reports is nearly always off when it comes to wireless phones AND wireless service.  Seriously, I get customers all the time who come in and say that this phone or that phone was rated very well in Consumer Reports.  Usually it&#039;s an LG, which in my experience last about 12 mos. on average.  Do some research for yourself, go look at some old articles, you&#039;ll be amused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that somebody else noticed this.  Actually it seems that Consumer Reports is nearly always off when it comes to wireless phones AND wireless service.  Seriously, I get customers all the time who come in and say that this phone or that phone was rated very well in Consumer Reports.  Usually it&#8217;s an LG, which in my experience last about 12 mos. on average.  Do some research for yourself, go look at some old articles, you&#8217;ll be amused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 275/279 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn3.berryreview.com

Served from: www.berryreview.com @ 2012-02-12 05:34:02 -->
