<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolfe Calls &#8220;BS&#8221; On Consumer Reports Rating Of BlackBerrys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2007/12/17/wolfe-calls-bs-on-consumer-reports-rating-of-blackberrys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2007/12/17/wolfe-calls-bs-on-consumer-reports-rating-of-blackberrys/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronen Halevy</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2007/12/17/wolfe-calls-bs-on-consumer-reports-rating-of-blackberrys/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Halevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2007/12/17/wolfe-calls-bs-on-consumer-reports-rating-of-blackberrys/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Sean,
I agree. I was baffled when I read the consumer reports article. It made me ashamed to have a subscription. Who did this research already? You need to go no further than this article released recently to see:
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/12/14/canalys-symbian-apple-iphone-already-leads-windows-mobile-in-us-market-share-q3-2007/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,<br />
I agree. I was baffled when I read the consumer reports article. It made me ashamed to have a subscription. Who did this research already? You need to go no further than this article released recently to see:<br />
<a href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/12/14/canalys-symbian-apple-iphone-already-leads-windows-mobile-in-us-market-share-q3-2007/" rel="nofollow">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/12/14/canalys-symbian-apple-iphone-already-leads-windows-mobile-in-us-market-share-q3-2007/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Doyel</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2007/12/17/wolfe-calls-bs-on-consumer-reports-rating-of-blackberrys/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Doyel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2007/12/17/wolfe-calls-bs-on-consumer-reports-rating-of-blackberrys/#comment-757</guid>
		<description>I'm glad that somebody else noticed this.  Actually it seems that Consumer Reports is nearly always off when it comes to wireless phones AND wireless service.  Seriously, I get customers all the time who come in and say that this phone or that phone was rated very well in Consumer Reports.  Usually it's an LG, which in my experience last about 12 mos. on average.  Do some research for yourself, go look at some old articles, you'll be amused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that somebody else noticed this.  Actually it seems that Consumer Reports is nearly always off when it comes to wireless phones AND wireless service.  Seriously, I get customers all the time who come in and say that this phone or that phone was rated very well in Consumer Reports.  Usually it&#8217;s an LG, which in my experience last about 12 mos. on average.  Do some research for yourself, go look at some old articles, you&#8217;ll be amused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
