<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumors Of Microsoft Buying RIM Always Floating Around</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.berryreview.com/2007/08/31/rumors-of-microsoft-buying-rim-always-floating-around/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2007/08/31/rumors-of-microsoft-buying-rim-always-floating-around/</link>
	<description>BlackBerry News and Reviews You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:18:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonny</title>
		<link>http://www.berryreview.com/2007/08/31/rumors-of-microsoft-buying-rim-always-floating-around/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 23:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.berryreview.com/2007/08/31/rumors-of-microsoft-buying-rim-always-floating-around/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>I would think that your frist statement is false as latter comments in your post would indicate that you have the corporate intellectual ability of a child selling homemade lemonade... sweet, but utterly useless.

How can you justify a comment that MS runs from Google? Different markets entirely, with of course the exception of the beta versions of LIVE. Although, integration of technologies and systems is a clear development for any tech firm, purchasing does bring the benefit of the value of R&amp;D. The value of RIM is way above the $38 billion that MS has in cash/short term investments.

Can you explain how MS purchasing other companies has damaged them? Do companies not aim for MS partnership status to give them a seal of appoval?

Or are you just another muppet trying to seem &quot;with it&quot; by pretending to hate the technology that you rely upon each and every day of your life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think that your frist statement is false as latter comments in your post would indicate that you have the corporate intellectual ability of a child selling homemade lemonade&#8230; sweet, but utterly useless.</p>
<p>How can you justify a comment that MS runs from Google? Different markets entirely, with of course the exception of the beta versions of LIVE. Although, integration of technologies and systems is a clear development for any tech firm, purchasing does bring the benefit of the value of R&amp;D. The value of RIM is way above the $38 billion that MS has in cash/short term investments.</p>
<p>Can you explain how MS purchasing other companies has damaged them? Do companies not aim for MS partnership status to give them a seal of appoval?</p>
<p>Or are you just another muppet trying to seem &#8220;with it&#8221; by pretending to hate the technology that you rely upon each and every day of your life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
